|
 |
|
The Liberal Republican Movement |
|
|
“Children Cry for It” |
|
Source: Harper’s Weekly |
|
Date:
February 3, 1872, p. 109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click to see
the previous version of this cartoon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complete HarpWeek Explanation:
Nast was undeterred by Harper’s Weekly editor George William Curtis’s
plea for prudence, and moved directly to challenge cartoonist Matt Morgan’s
depiction in Leslie’s Illustrated of Grant as the reluctant reformer. In
“Children Cry for It” (dated February 3, 1872; published January 23), the
president remarks, “If you can stand it I can,” as he feeds a steaming bowl of
“Civil Service Reform” gruel to a group of unreceptive Republican liberals. The
lower caption is excerpted from Grant’s annual message to Congress of the
previous December, in which he endorsed civil service reform.
Behind the steaming bowl of “Civil Service Reform” stand the perplexed duo of
Greeley (right) and George Wilkes (left), editor of Wilkes’ Spirit of the
Times. In line for the gruel are (left-right): Senator Carl Schurz, Senator
Charles Sumner, Senator Lyman Trumbull, and Senator Reuben Fenton. Behind
Sumner’s shoulder is Congressman Nathaniel Banks; partially obscured behind the
heads of Trumbull and Fenton is Senator John Logan; and behind Banks, wearing
glasses, is Congressman James Brooks. The picture on the left wall recalls
Grant’s Civil War service as Union military commander.
Editor Curtis again complained privately to Nast about his pictorial attack
on the anti-Grant liberals. Nevertheless, the artist’s assault not only
continued, but intensified. Curtis was not alone in his negative assessment.
Throughout the year a great deal of ink was devoted to criticizing the work of
the nation’s two major political cartoonists, Nast and Matt Morgan. Their
special discipline of caricature—the portraiture of distortion as a vehicle for
personal attack—struck many editors as particularly wanton. As early as May 12,
the Boston Gazette warned readers about the excesses of “Caricature In
The Canvass,” and how it was throwing all caution and restraint to the wind:
“The Presidential campaign of 1872 is likely to be memorable for the pictorial
features of its warfare … There is an outrage upon propriety … which it is the
duty of journalism to rebuke in no uncertain tone.” As the campaign wore on,
the Brooklyn Eagle, the Washington Daily Patriot, the Chicago
Inter-Ocean, Atlantic Monthly, and other periodicals joined in the
condemnation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|